Quote:
Originally Posted by Rikster
Except I didn't so why misportray what I actually said?
Canuck fans and management were overly concerned about Tanev's inability to stay in the lineup, 4 years later Tanev has shown that those concerns were misguided.
But since you took the time to go over my posting history, why not comment on some other posts I made at the time to see how they've aged?
Bingo wrote: Calgary and Vancouver's cores are pretty similar in age, the Flames aren't doing a full rebuild any time soon.
Vancouver's playoff chances are slim to none...
To which I replied:
I spent some time reviewing your posting history and gotta say it’s pretty vanilla although I noticed this seems to be your posting style:
|
Indeed. So given that you were wrong, have you stopped to think about whether some of your takes are misguided?
Especially given the clear & consistent bias slanted against former Canucks that have become Flames property. Doesn't seem like you see things objectively. Just the way of a jilted lover who tries to logic themselves into reasons why those players won't work out.