[blankall]

Originally Posted by Bagor

Absolutely. it's a problem but I believe both the Israelis and Americans are both saying that they believe there was no involvement from them in the attack.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/11/polit...ubt/index.html
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/iran...y?id=103831380
https://www.reuters.com/world/initia...es-2023-10-11/

But that won't stop blankall spouting random lies because that's what he does.

And I wouldn't put any faith in the credibility of the wsj. It's reckless of them to suggest what they did the day after based on nothing. But that's what they do. Print baseless claims..

There's no way to prove how involved Iran was. We know they've been given training, weapons, tactics, intelligence, etc.. to Hamas leaders. The attack juts happened to happen weeks or even day before an alliance between Iran's two biggest enemies was about to occur. Unless someone like Sinwar confesses that Iran set it up, they'll never be proof. Even then, it's a bit of a blurred line between encouraging an attack and being involved in an attack. If Iran is purposely exploiting a desperate group of people and giving all the means and encouragement to attack, at what point do you consider them to be an active player.

Also, LOL at discrediting the Wall Street Journal. Second largest newspaper in America. Won the 2023 Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Journalism.