Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
On the first point...I think for the stat that Bingo mentioned he's right.
It shouldn't impact the Canucks ability to finish those chances, what should be impacted is the volume of those type of chances they are getting.
|
If your rush chances are coming predominantly in odd-man situations your shooting % has a pretty good chance to be a fair bit higher.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
If anything it should be the opposite if what you are saying is happening and they should be generating a higher volume of rush chances because teams are taking risks and overcommiting in the offensive zone on them.
|
Why do more when less do trick
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
In terms of the sustainability I don't think 50 games is a large enough sample when it comes to sustainability.
|
So after which game they repeat the same sort of script do we get to call it sustainable?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Not on this stat ...
We have no definition on quality. You're assuming without any data that the Canucks have had on average higher quality rush chances.
|
Sure, but I'm watching all the games. My eyes aren't lying on me as they frequently come up ice with a 3on2 or 4on3 and generate a shot from the open man.
I mean, cling to this if it makes you feel better. It's not going to change the outcomes. The stat people say is unsustainable changes every few weeks, but the Canucks just keep on keeping on.
PDO Rocket. Moon. Nyeeeeeerm