[bluejays]

The same question came up last year about Lindholm where I’d say many thought they should give him that eight year deal. Now in hindsight I think most would recognize giving out those contracts to aging vets is a huge risk that is unlikely to work out, especially in the back half of the contract.

Now when reading the same about Hanifin, what’s the difference here? He’s a defenceman, a couple years younger, but the same principle applies. He’s not an elite talent, does a lot of things solid but nothing spectacular, and plays a game that isn’t physically taxing on the body. Couldn’t the same have been said about Brodie a few years ago? And look at him now. Replacement worthy. I fully acknowledge Hanifin is a different skill set and better one at that but 8 year deal for a non elite talent at a relatively high price tag? Hell no. Trade him. Or ask him to sign a four year.