Quote:
Originally Posted by Infinit47
I guess this is my overall question then. Why is a criminal conviction required here but not in terminations for Perry and Kane?
I don't think anyone is arguing Dube should get his day in court, that's just obvious.
Maybe I'm reacting emotionally, but I hope there is some some more definitive action possible on behalf of the NHL and the Flames. Because t really feels to me like they are simply hoping this will blow over.
|
Kane and Perry were under contract and acting on behalf of their respective teams as all players are when playing in the NHL.
None of these 5 were, and were under the purview of HC at the time of the incident.
At least that's my understanding.
I am the farthest thing from a lawyer however and merely parsing everything i have read/heard into what is actually happening.
Things may change as soon as Monday though depending on what the LPS comes out with in their press conference.