Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug
Which I think highlights how subjective even the inclusion criteria is, let alone the actual player evaluation. September 1 of this year, I doubt anyone had Zary as a full time NHLer. Now he has proven himself and the Flames ranking goes (presumably) down because of it? Doesn't really make sense to me.
|
whereas Holloway might still be considered a prospect, despite being taken ahead , exactly the same age, and about a 60 game head start in the NHL
in isolation each decision could make sense but it does show how the choices could skew the rankings (*note I have no clue whether Holloway will be included as a prospect)