Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald
Do you have a link to the ranking? Would like to see it. Would like to see their ranking prior to the start of the season for comparison if you have it. Just found The Hockey Writer's mid-season prospect rankings and Vancouver jumped to 16 just ahead of the Flames and Brzustewicz was added to their top five. If a player isn't ranked before the season and then jumps to #5, that would speak volumes about the dearth of quality prospects in the system more than anything. I also wouldn't say Wallinder or Lekkerimaki are A+ prospects. Not many teams have an A+ prospect, let alone two, especially a system ranked in the middle of the league. The Flames have zero A+ prospects and are at #17. I think that because Brzustewicz is a Flame now his stock has skyrocketed for the board. If he was a name tossed around as the principle before the trade was announced the mood on the possible deal would have been much different and people would not have been happy. They would have (and did) demanded Wallinder or Lekkerimaki along with Hoglander and the 1st for compensation of taking on Kuzmenko. As I've said, it's a good trade for the depth it provides to our paper thin prospect depth on the blueline, but it is a futures trade and now we have to watch and hope these kids turn into players. |
Saw plenty at the beginning of the trade drop last night suggesting Kuzmenko, Brzustewicz and a 1st would be a great trade for Calgary, so there was plenty of appreciation for the Canuck's third ranked prospect before has named in the trade.
Getting another prospect and a pick makes this trade more than most were expecting (not all).
Wouldn't it make sense to just admit they got more than you expected instead of shifting to diminishing a pretty good prospect in order to maintain you were right?
So tiring.