Quote:
Originally Posted by Ped
Sure.
|
Do you know what “as a matter of fact” means?
Because running along a line of logic that says “if what that agent says is true, and what Sec says is true, then it would absolve him of guilty” it ain’t. How does that constitute an attempt to absolve him and not just stating a scenario where he would be?
The same poster said he doesn’t care who is guilty and wants them brought to justice regardless of who they are. So, who is he trying to absolve?