I'm not trying to absolve him. I'm just noting that if your parse the flames statement and dubes statements and the agents statements and ask yourself "why does it read differently than the other players involved?"
This perhaps explains why. Each new bit of information makes it seem more likely than it did prior. I don't know if it's gone from 10% chance to 20% likelihood Dube is pizza guy. Or if it's gone from 20% to 99%.
I'm just noting that there's a scenario out there where one player is innocent and incremental details seem to incrembtally suggest it's plausible that player is Dube.
But if you want to live in a world of absolutes, you do that.
|