Quote:
Originally Posted by nfotiu
It's odd that for both Kylington and Dube the team put out a communication that it wasn't related to substance abuse. If it turns out that Hart and Dube are both on leave because of this, are they going to have to put out a statement that it is not due to substance abuse, or criminal activity in the future?
On another note, it seems a bit crappy that they do put out the qualifier of not substance abuse, as it further stigmatizes substance abuse as something worse and may prevent others from entering the program.
|
Your second point is spot-on, but I doubt there will be an ongoing need for the kind of qualification you mentioned in the first. It's not every day that an internationally reported criminal indictment involves multiple professional athletes at the same time.