[Sec214]

Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction

It's easy to read between the lines of what some of the players or their lawyers stated publicly. While being vague and saying they weren't involved in wrongdoing and are cooperating isn't an admission or evidence of guilt or knowledge, saying less is something you would expect them to do if they may have been involved. For example, Gadjovich's lawyer called the incident reprehensible and was a lot stronger in his words when it came to cooperating. If a lawyer thought their client did something reprehensible, I doubt they would air that publicly. You never know though, maybe their client wasn't forthright either.

Strickland tweeted in August that there would be a total of 5 players suspended once everything is final and hinted that he knew the names, but couldn't mention them. More than 5 players gave really vague answers though.