Quote:
Originally Posted by DazzlinDino
Someone showed a picture of the puck hitting Tarvars stick after it hit Coleman. Shouldn't the Flames be allowed to refute the challenge call especially since it hit a Toronto players stick?
|
Yes, the Flames could have challenged that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob
The ref should have looked at that as part of the review. So there would not have been any point challenging that because in the refs opinion he didn't think it touched a toronto player after.
|
Ny understanding is that, when there is a challenge, they only review what was challenged. If there is a 2nd issue, that requires another challenge. There have been situations in the past where one thing is reviewed, and the call goes one way, then the other team challenges something else, and the call was reversed. I haven't seen that in a while, but it does happen.
If there was any evidence that the puck touched Tavares' stick, the Flames should have challenged it. I doubt there was though. And they had like 10 mintes to find evidence of it.