View Single Post
Old 01-12-2024, 04:48 PM   #1466
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by traptor View Post
I dont think it was crazy expectations to expect a late 1st back for him especially considering the year he came off of and that we could have retained him down to 2million.
It obviously was considering we:
1. didn’t get a first for him
2. the market proved a first wasn’t on the table

If we retained, we would have one less retention slot right now, which diminishes the potential value of higher profile guys like Lindholm. Is that what you would have preferred?
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote