01-12-2024, 12:49 PM
|
#1448
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Wall of Fame, not shame:
NSFW!
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
Sharangovich is a good pickup ... terrific shot. Would be very curious to see him on Huberdeau's wing.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch
Thats a good trade, sharongovich is a good young forward. Always stood out when I watched NJ. And 3rds in this draft are valuable.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
Sharangovich is 25-year-old 6'2" centre who has produced around 0.5 pts/GP in each of his first three NHL seasons.
I like it.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers
He’s got a wicked shot and he was under-utilized last year. Great piece for Calgary.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
From what I remember seeing, Sharangovich could be a Duclair type winger for Huberdeau based on his speed and skill.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalFlamesFan
Sharangovich coming into his prime. Great shot and given some freedom could be a 25 goal scorer a season. I think he improved his two way play but still has some inconsistency in his game. Gets the Flames 6 years younger - and keeps them competitive with a player who has shown in flashes that there is some real upside there. Feels like a gamble but not an uneducated one.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman
I like this trade very much. Replaces an older player with a 25 yo 6’2” shooter who can play C. Good job, Conny!
We got bigger, younger, and faster today.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
We heard they were looking at younger players or prospects that were close. Why are people surprised that's when they went and did?
I don't know how good Sharangovich will be but he's produced at times and still is young. So they reset the asset clock which is positive. Could they have gotten a late 1st or something? Beats me.
Happy that they are making moves that at least has some eye on the future.
Those thinking that the Flames were actually going to do a full re-build are going to continue to be upset and bash their heads against a wall. As one does.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage
I figured Toffoli would bring back a 2nd and a 3rd so this checks out. For me anyway. Watched the Devils a fair bit. Sharangovich is noticeable. In a good way. Need players to round out the roster, not just kids from the farm. Good deal
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
I do not hate this at all, and I'm as cynical about the Flames as anyone you'll ever meet.
Sharangovich isn't gonna be a core piece but he's a good player. He probably has the best shot of anyone in the entire organization. Really curious to see what he can do.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wood
Such strong opinions for someone a lot are clearly ignorant about...
We all know what Tyler Toffoli is, and he's not a 75 point guy. This year was clearly the outlier and other teams know that
Sharangovich put up nearly identical numbers to Toffoli in his first 2 NHL seasons, and is a comparable player in that he's big and has an elite shot
Yegor though offers a lot more speed/agility and he uses his size more than Toffoli. He's not a powerforward but he gets involved a lot more than Toffoli who is exclusively a perimeter shooter
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Initial thought?
Zero retention is great. That's a full load off the cap, some wiggle room.
Sharangovich is fast, has a wicked shot. Tangible traits we have been crying for. Speed!
He will fit in a fast tempo structure.
The 3rd is nice to have back.
Comparing the trade in which we got Toffoli is stupid. Different GM, different situations.
Ppl saying Conroy got fleeced are crazy.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sch19lks
I wonder how many posters that don’t like this trade have actually watched Sharangovich play.
He’ll be a fan favourite by Christmas
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra
To some extent, this is similar to when the Flames got Lindholm and Hanifin.
Most hated that trade, but they got 12 years of Lindholm and Hanifin for 2 years of Hamilton and 1 year of Ferland.
We’ll get multiple years out of Shar for 1 year of Toffoli.
Calgary needed to get younger and cheaper, and they accomplished that.
They were never in the short term going to get younger, cheaper and better.
No one was willing to give up a first round pick for Toffoli.
Taylor Hall was given away for free. Should Toffoli actually have been worth so much more?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferarri
Flames always said they were going to take the best offer on the table. It's not like they chose this deal over better offers and left assets on the table. The market dictated Tofoli's worth and this ended up being it. People saying we should have waited until the trade deadline underestimate the potential for Tofoli to have a bad year and really diminish his marketability.
I personally know nothing about the guy we got in return other than a quick google search and what others have said about him. This isn't a homerun trade for Conroy but people are being overly critical of the deal. The expectation of getting a first round pick or a huge haul just aren't feasible when being dealt this deck of cards. If a player wants out and requests a trade you are negotiating from a position of weakness. Other teams know this.
Patience is key and I think fans will be pleasantly surprised with what we got back.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KootenayFlamesFan
Younger, faster.........check.
Save cap space.........check.
Add in a draft pick.......check.
I'm really not hating this deal.
|
|
|
|