Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug
Perhaps, but I think there should also be some acknowledgement that there are processes and departments within the city that do review these plans and remove/change many projects. Wasn't it you that claimed that the city planners are a joke, or something to that effect? Are you sure? You have some expertise in this field? I would think that the process is working reasonably well, as the goal for the city is for more development/density rather than less and that these consultations can lead to tweaks that were otherwise overlooked. It won't likely lead to cancellation of the project, but I don't think that is the intended purpose.
|
I never said the city planners are a joke, and you must have me confused with someone else. I called this laughable, which it is. Glenmore Landing needs improvement as it is. Plenty of people avoid it or use it as a last resort today based on the traffic flow issues. I’ve seen the proposals for how they’re going to improve with this project and it’s incredibly limited. That’s because it has to be with that location and the existing infrastructure.