Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Come on now
I am saying the points are basically equal, Lindros had something that no other generational star ever had though which would have potentially put him ahead
That was a response to a post that was supposedly shutting me down because Lindros had one less point
|
This was all in response you being incredulous at SixtySix's suggestion that "Flyers gave up the best player in that trade": by insinuation, Peter Forsberg. You started arguing that Lindros was one of the all-time greatest players and was cut down injury, and pointed to his 1995-96 season as "one of the greatest seasons of all time."
I pointed out that you picked a stupid example, because that wasn't even far and away the best personal season of anyone in 1995-96. And you can argue 'til you're blue in the face about "dominance", but to even suggest that Lindros's '95-'96 season is among the all-time greats is patently ridiculous.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
IMO and I can't stress this enough IMO he would have been the most dominant player of all time without the concussion issues
I watched him live in the mid 90s and I have never seen a player dominate like that.
I have seen all the others live too, I'm guessing some of you are just going by hockey DB
|
Likewise I can't stress this enough: in my opinion,
your opinion of the matter is dumb. And the insinuation that anyone who disagrees with you is "just going by HockeyDB" is dumb.
I'm old enough to have watched both Lindros and Forsberg play their entire careers, and your opinion that Lindros was "on another level" is silly.