Quote:
Originally Posted by dieHARDflameZ
Disagree. That play is one consistent motion. That type of goal should be allowed in my opinion. The BS where a guy hacks and wacks and blatantly pushes the pad in should not. It’s really not that difficult in my opinion.
|
Quote:
|
"Goals should be disallowed only if: (1) an attacking player, either by his positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper’s ability to move freely within his crease or defend his goal; or (2) an attacking player initiates intentional or deliberate contact with a goalkeeper, inside or outside of his goal crease. Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact."
|
That's the beauty about rules. You can disagree with a rule, but it's still a rule.
The refs made the correct ruling.