I sense the sarcasm. I don't have the answers, but I'm saying there are other nuances to consider but I wouldn't shut out anyone completely based on a criminal past or a checkered past. It's what can they do in the future with some consideration of their past for assessing the totality of the risk it could pose. But I wouldn't shut out anyone entirely as I think that's wrong, millionaire or not. I also don't hold athletes to as high a regard as I think most aren't good people compared to the average joe. As for your last example of making someone feel uncomfortable by hiring someone based on their past, I'd just say if the person with the checkered past has contrition for what they've done and don't pose a threat, and are a good teammate, then high chances they're eligible. Everyone we all work with aren't angels.
|