Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
Nobody is forcing Chick-fil-a to be open on Sundays. Please for the love of god just learn one thing about the bill.
|
I may be wrong but there appears to be something strange about the way this bill is written. It's either trying to address an issue that does not exist, is trying to grab headlines, which appears to have done. It may be also getting ahead of any potential problems when a key contract along a vital piece of highway comes up for renewal in 30 years (33 year deal signed in 21).
Perhaps we are both missing something or this bill is trying to ensure that all food business are open 7 days a week, for no reason other than to exclude Chic Fil A as a potential tenant in the future . That's fine but also strange.
The current contract requires Applegreen “to have at least one hot and cold food option available 24 hours a day at all locations,”
https://www.verifythis.com/article/n...5-8c39785b7a76
So it sounds like this bill would require multiple locations to be open? If the current contract is meeting the requirements, what is with this nothing burger, sorry chicken sandwich, of a bill? To ensure that in 30 years someone will have a place to eat on a Sunday along one of the busiest roads in America, of which is already happening?
Perhaps why all media outlets are reporting this incorrectly? Key words being Chic Fil A COULD BE forced.
https://www.nbcnewyork.com/entertain...-bill/4972418/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/chick-f...new-york-bill/
https://abc7chicago.com/rest-stop-re...ours/14206707/
https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/28/busin...top/index.html
https://fortune.com/2023/12/22/new-y...close-sundays/