Like I said three years ago ... I'll say it again now (though now it appears I'm not quite so alone)
Global science seems to be in a real rush to reach a conclusion that can't be reached in 100 years. That worries me. Comments like "meteorologists that don't agree should be decertified" worreis me. Comments like "the science is in" worries me. Comments like "holocaust deniers" worries me.
Whenever those on the majority don't want to even hear dissent you have to wonder where things are heading. If you have that much "right" on your side you should welcome the opportunity to prove it over and over again and not run from it.
Why is it that whenever someone questions this stuff they are lackeys of the oil industry while there is rarely any mention of who funds the other side? Grants are just as dangerous as industry money for swaying opinion, and numerous scientists have pointed this out.
Me? I don't have a clue ... I just read what I can. I'm certainly not pro pollution so there should be some benefits over this hysteria, but you sure hate to see so much money going to something that might slide off the table in a decade.
|