Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK
Not for the movements that you had originally referenced.
It sounds like the most active movements were appropriately prioritized.
|
Yeah I explained that confusingly. What I meant is that it wasn't an oversight, but rather like I said the only way for a directional ramp on the WB-SB movement would be the insurmountable movement of the substation, or a big flyover all the way over top the entire complex which would have been a big challenge given the proximity of 37 St as the approach would have to start really far back, so that leaves only a tunnel.
So finding some way to skew the interchange to give them just enough room to build a 2 lane loop ramp might have been the least of all evils.