Quote:
Originally Posted by Zevo
Lol what? Wait I thought that was coerced, so he is Hamas for sure now?
|
Isn’t that what you’re suggesting?:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zevo
What more do you want ffs. The guy says he is Hamas and that Hamas uses the hospital and has offices in the hospital.
|
But then:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zevo
What I took from it is Hamas lies.
|
So which is it? Hamas lies? Or Hamas speaking is “video evidence ffs”? You’re telling us it’s Hamas, and that Hamas should be believed when someone from Hamas is speaking, but numbers from the Gaza Health Ministry shouldn’t be believed even though news agencies and human rights organizations take them as reliable because… you don’t like what they say? or?…
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zevo
Really? Come on Pepsi, you're not that obtuse. Just by quoting the numbers given by the "health ministry" after it's been made clear that they tried to blame the hospital deaths on Israel and greatly inflated the numbers. What I took from it is Hamas lies.
And yes the article is fair. I don't have an issue with the article. It shows the truth is somewhere in the middle, I'm not the one that doesn't know that.
|
The truth is somewhere in the middle of… what? What are the other numbers we should be considering and finding the middle between? You say the article is fair, no issues right?:
Quote:
|
International news agencies, including AP, as well as humanitarian workers and rights groups, have used the ministry’s numbers when independent verification is impossible.
|
So that’s fair, no issues, but when people here quote those new agencies in question it’s “giving Hamas more credence” than the unavailable Israeli numbers and creating a “double standard”?
If you’re going to call me obtuse, make sure you actually answered the question. I’m not interested in you whining about one incident, show me who is believing Hamas on every issue and who is saying we should believe Hamas in general.