12-19-2023, 07:10 PM
|
#12549
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion
Phang asked, “do you think then, if they’re intellectually honest, that the members of SCOTUS will not only take up this case, but would be forced to follow the text of section three of the 14th amendment and affirm the decision to not let Donald Trump be on a ballot?”
“I do,” Katyal definitively replied. “When it comes to Donald Trump, it’s important to remember this is the court that ruled against him many times in the 2020 election.”
“It’s the court that ruled against his executive privilege claims over the January 6 committee in an eight-to-one decision last year.”
“So, you know, I think that a fair-minded reading of this provision really compels this result.”
The Colorado Supreme Court, he added, “took pains to say, you know – this is just a quote from the opinion – ‘we’re mindful in our solemn duty to apply the law without fear or favor, and without being swayed by public reaction to the decisions that the law mandates we reach.’ And I think that the United States Supreme Court would apply that same standard. Trump will be disqualified from the ballot.”
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/polit...cb6fef08&ei=33
|
I hope he's right. I really really do. But after Roe v Wade, I don't see how you could trust them to be impartial.
|
|
|