Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
Neither is Sliver, nor has he nor anyone else’s suggested they don’t like people who are “for destroying Hamas,” as everyone here is “for” destroying Hamas and the only disagreement seems to be around the approach and human cost.
You seem to want everything two ways.
You mock and dismiss experts you disagree with, while expect yours to be taken without question.
You throw around labels and associations with Hamas or terrorist ideology despite those same people expressing repeatedly that they want Hamas eliminated, while expecting people to ignore you calling Palestinian civilians “animals” or shrugging at their situation with things like “guess they shouldn’t vote-in extremists” because you said you think they deserve a state “25 times.”
At a certain point, you have to take some level of responsibility with the way people interact with you. Saying you’re leaving the thread only to post a dozen times directly after once a week is pretty much indicative of your entire approach: you say things you want people to believe, but everything else you say tells the opposite story.
|
I dismiss them because I believe they are wrong and provide several counter arguments you happily never engage with. My main gripes are the inappropriate usage of the word genocide to describe what it is going on. It is not a genocide. No population experiences significant growth while experiencing a genocide, especially a supposed one that has lasted 75 years. The Jewish population still has not recovered from the holocaust, you simply cannot use the same word to describe this as you would to describe the holocaust, Armenian genocide, Amhara genoicde, Rwandan genocide etc. It is not the same. By me arguing against that ridiculous assertion I somehow don’t have empthy, i do. Again i have mentioned the Palestinian situation is terrible, I do not take any sort of joy out of seeing dead civilians but I place blame on Hamas who actively puts their civilians in danger and started this war by raping, pillaging, torturing and hostage taking. I made a comment right when their attacked happened that got misconstrued as me calling Palestinians as animals. That was not my intention and I apologized for it, my intent was calling Hamas animals, but if you want me again to apologize for that here it is. My apologies for the usage of the word animals.
Your side provides no solution, no actual plan, and wants Israel to resume the status quo with no end in sight. This time it will not happen and Hamas will pay, unfortunately civilians are being killed which happens in war. But this is because of the way Hamas uses human shields. You can disagree with my stance, that’s fine. The pro-Palestinian side loves to live in an echo chamber hence people questioning my humanity over the mere accusation that Hamas is to blame for 1. Starting the war and 2. Hiding behind civilians creating civilian deaths.
With Hamas eliminated and Gaza demilitarized there will be far less civilian casualties in the future. That’s my view, I don’t think this is very extreme. But to some I guess I am equated to a skinheaded holocaust denier.