Quote:
Originally Posted by Devils'Advocate
Then the anti-environment right-wingers point to the few "scientists" that say that it is all malarky and say "see.. I told you so".
|
Care to provide one 'credited' scientist who disagrees with some of the science Gore presented in his movie, who has ALSO said that global warming is malarky?
Quote:
|
Like I have said in the other threads, the anti-global-warming folk don't really need to prove that global warming doesn't exist. They only have to confuse the public just enough that there isn't the political will to move forward on this issue and the situation will continue to get worse.
|
Wow. Just wow. Is there even a debate whether or not global warming exists?
Just like I said, whenever someone has a problem with the message Gore is presenting, we instantly get labeled 'global warming deniers.' Complete BS.
I really wonder who is confusing the public here...you and your one-sided, ban all other viewpoints idea....or the rest of us who are still trying to find out all the facts as to whether or not global warming is such a concern that we ought to cut back emissions by HUGE standards in 10 years. Or like Tranny said, whether or not it is worth spending billions, perhaps trillions of dollars to try and prevent something that just might be out of our control. Ever heard of mother nature? I have a feeling she just might be in control of things here.
Funny that people start threads on here bitching about the 456 billion the US spent on Iraq...but has no problem with the whole world throwing billions in the direction of something we are very unsure about.
Way to be unbiased though. Very nice.
Quote:
|
Those who say the class should be 50% "Inconvenient Truth" and 50% "Global Warming Swindle", should science class be 50% "Evolution" and 50% "Intellegent Design"? Should they be given equal footing?
|
Another gem. I see that Captain took care of it.