Quote:
Originally Posted by Devils'Advocate
.
Those who say the class should be 50% "Inconvenient Truth" and 50% "Global Warming Swindle", should science class be 50% "Evolution" and 50% "Intellegent Design"? Should they be given equal footing?
|
Aren't we talking about two different things here. The evolution vs Intelligent design, as I was told in other threads is science vs theology, so in a science class, probably not.
But the pro-Gore, pro-global warming, against researchers who say that it is overblown probably should be since both sides claim to use the same scienctific methods and research methods, so based around the teaching of science they both have validity in the class room.