Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta
Why would we do that, when we can just reduce funding for universities and tell people "it's gonna take some belt tightening, and we got to make some sacrifices", all the while providing nine-digit funding for a new hockey arena and virtue signal $1.3 billion on a mythical pipeline?
|
I don’t think framing as a choice between hockey arenas and pipelines and healthcare is beneficial. We do not have a tax base shortage. A simple PST would fund all of these initiatives. I think it becomes divisive that it frames people who support tax payers funding the arena as being against funding of healthcare. You can be for both.