Quote:
Originally Posted by you&me
I feel like some of the questions asking for specific changes should be made, have been asked in good faith and seem reasonable in order to qualify the feelings of those affected and quantify what can be done.
It seems odd that the same posters that are often so quick to dismiss the "feelings" and "lived experience" of those that have expressed discomfort with the situation in and around the C-Train stations are the same to now dismiss anyone asking to quantify the changes that would improve the lives of the LGBTQ+ community.
Soooo... are we cool with wanting to change "everything, all of it" for the reason of "just 'cause" in all situations that someone feels vulnerable, or just some times?
|
It’s bad faith when multiple examples have been brought up, the thread is actually based on one of the examples, it’s in the first post, and the people asking have weighed in on the same issues they’re now asking for proof of the very existence of in their multiple-year posting history. Bad faith questions get flippant responses. And it’s fair to question how much effort people owe others who ask for things just to pick them apart.
But sure, let’s talk about the c-train. Who are you referring to? What would you like to change? Please list every law and policy you think should be changed to solve people feeling uncomfortable on the train so I can validate your feelings and quantify what I, guy on the internet, will do to solve it, which is absolutely something I will do and not something I will ask for again in 6-12 months when the topic re-appears.