Soooo... good will is supposed to stop me from taking your stuff? The 'law' which no longer has any government backing (funding)? Who makes the 'law' now to say that I'm breaking it? You make your own, and say that I'm violating it? Sure you've got a right to defend yourself, but what if you're disabled?
What I was talking about is called Natural Law, and the thing is – no one creates it, it is discovered by reson. It follows from the simple fact that people act in a world of scarce resources. Because resources are scarce, there needs to be a way how to allocate them. One way is through violence, where the fittest survive and other way is through private property rights paradigm. I`m not too sure going into details here is appropriate for a hockey board, but for a full full debate, check out this:
Ethics of Liberty mainly
Part One - Natural Law. Then we may discuss particular elements you disagree with.
Please explain this theory further, it is unclear. I'm not exactly sure how you enforce order in this new (lack of) system. Also, what happens to handicapped individuals, those who are sick, orphans, etc. Are you expecting all of these issues to be taken care of by goodwill? Utopian.
As for the defense and law enforcement, you did not read the article I linked, did you? Its not too long. Then we can talk about details you have issues with, it will be much clearer.
And again, I dont know where is that coming from – handicaped individuals not being taken care for. Guess what – weak and powerless were being taken care for looong before state pension system came into place late 19th century and are taken care for now in places where the government fails totaly. Thinking that the state is a babysitter, the only one who will save people, that is utopian.
Your system seems to be a 'survival of the fittest' state. I find that somewhat distasteful.
To me it seems to be the exact opposite. It allows everyone to pursue their own happiness in cooperation with others. Somewhere I have read that people privately donate more money to charities that the state spends on its social programs. Hmm I wonder why.
Also, I have read that people spend more money on private security than the state spends on the police. Hmm I again wonder why.