Quote:
Originally Posted by Burninator
Well I'm glad that you're right and have the answer for us.  |
I never said I had the answer. Neither of us have the answer, therefore neither of us can ban one side...like taking God out of the equation...nor could we put God in the equation and say he did everything and science means nothing.
I look at it this way. If God did indeed create us....he created us to become this knowledgeable. Meaning he also created everything we have learned about....which to me means he used scientific methods to do so, because we are learning about this science.
Its sad to say that certain people deny that science, but that is their prerogative. Me and you can look at it, and go wow. Because really, looking at what science has done for us...we SHOULD go wow.
Quote:
Well without getting into a debate about the merits of creationism for the dozenth time on this forum, I won't. But I will ask you a question.
How does placing god in the creation or creationism theory help the learning process?
|
What does taking God out of something he is the most important part of help anything? Creation/creationism is defined around God existing. So I don't really know what you're asking.
Are you trying to tell me life would be much better if we removed the side you disagree with, simply because, on your terms, it would not help the learning process? What learning process? Creationism is based around God. Read the definition Textcritic provided.
Quote:
|
Oh, I thought they were getting at something else, I didn't catch that. I've heard something about the Flatters Society before, but I thought they are a joke.
|
We all think it is a joke, so why bring it up?