Quote:
Originally Posted by ben voyonsdonc
Lindholm and Hanifin are on pretty cheap deals that would be pro-rated so I don’t know if there would be a burning need to retain to move them. Tanev would make more sense for a retention.
If we retained and got a 3rd and 5th this year, I’d be happier with that…it’s still a pretty ####ty return though. At least you could use those assets for a variety of purposes but a 3rd in 2026 is useless IMO.
The only purpose for us to grab significant cap space is to take on a bad contract to get a better return in a trade. I don’t see any other need for it.
|
That's true, but pro-rated doesn't works with LTIR, which 14/31 potential trade partners are using ATM.