Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald
Missed the sarcasm did you? Not surprised based on the topic.
Your comment, that's the real ironic part. BBC and NY Times have been learning very pro-Israel, just like all western media have, but they have had the audacity to question some of the information floated out there and do some actual analysis to counter propaganda. That has put them in the crosshairs of the pro-Israel set, because if you don't support them all the time you're an antisemite who is out to destroy Israel. Objectivity need not apply when you have "3,000 years of history" on your side. Amiright?
The least self-aware poster in CP history.
|
That is a pretty funny assertion from someone who told a poster (me) to watch what they post or people won’t like Jews. Seems like you are just referencing yourself in that last sentence. Your sarcastic remarks about Jewish history continue to reinforce that you are exactly what you are crying about being labeled.
The New York Times and BBC are not extremely pro-Israel like you claim. Maybe it is for someone like you who believes Al-Jazeera is an exemplary news source. I then could see why you feel the BBC and New York Times are not Pro-Palestinian enough.