Quote:
Originally Posted by Zevo
Why are you arguing it's not in the agreement then? Explain to me what difference that should make.
|
I'm not arguing it's not in the agreement. I'm arguing that Israel CLAIMS that it is is in the agree and the agreement has been broken and then you have people like Manhattanboy blindly stating it as fact.
Just as Hamas are CLAIMING that Israel broke the terms of the agreement.
The difference it makes is that these CLAIMS by BOTH sides can be used as justification for breaking the ceasefire. If it's in the agreement then yes there are grounds for the ceasefire being broken. If it's not then it's nothing more than a false claim.
As I said it would be a lot simpler if the agreement were available so the claims could be verified.