Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
They factor in other things like XGF, XGA, etc. And the problem is that these types of stats are nowhere near being refined enough to be particularly useful.
The site you quoted simply runs outcomes. The calculated odds are a summation of all possible simulations. As simplistic as this is, it is very useful, if you understand statistics and outcomes.
Neither is close to being gospel, but one is much cleaner than the other.
|
Thanks for the explanation. Still feels wild that the Oil could have so much life still based on that model when they're performing worse than practically everyone else.