Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly
That is an extreme difference you’ve just described. The 2023 Coyotes versus, let’s say, the 70s Canadiens?
The burden of proof is on the state to convince a jury that a victim is in fact such. Typically there are persuasive defense opportunities done on cross examination of state’s witnesses.
It would be silly of them to actually play cards, but they can. The state can accuse me of being Rumplestiltskin, have fun proving it beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
You probably are not Rumplestiltskin though. Lucic has a wife that has injuries on her after he came home bombed from the bar. Probably easier to prove that Lucic committed the crime he is accused of beyond a reasonable doubt than to prove you are Rumplestiltskin.