Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
Someone accusing you of committing the crime is evidence enough to bring the charge. Look at all these historical sexual abuse claims. There's no evidence other than the accuser. The police can't dismiss the claims just because there's no hard evidence to back up a crime that happened 10+ years ago.
If the accuser is lying, it's the accuser who can be sued for unlawful confinement, not the police.
It's a much bigger liability issue for the police, if they investigate a domestic incident, do nothing, and then someone ends up seriously hurt or dead later.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
There still a good chance he didn't do it too, or that the situation is a lot more complex than him simply assaulting her. She could have been striking or pushing him and he pulled her hair to get her away. Sounds bad, but it's better than striking her with a closed fist.
Or he could have done exactly what his wife is accusing him of.
Saying someone probably did something isn't the same as saying they definitely did.
|
Except in Lucic’s case they have photographic evidence of injuries that she suffered and she says he inflicted them upon her. Now I suppose there is an outside chance she beat herself or that she has an elaborate scheme where someone else beat her, caused the injuries and then she pinned it on poor Looch. But I suspect those far fetched scenarios are not the case.
But there is the scenario where Looch skipped dad duty during the sleepover to leave the parenting to mom and came home bombed and did nothing wrong, she instigated the violence and he simply was pulling her away with her hair to prevent him from being violently assaulted. That scenario where a bombed Looch and a sober mom have that type of interaction also seems incredibly far fetched.