Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
It's possible to both protect victims of violence, domestic or otherwise, and follow the rule of law yourself.
That's in fact what's going on with Lucic and his bail conditions. While due process occurs, he's not allowed to interact with the purported victim.
Your views are pretty dangerous. You are correct that women do get pressured into recanting evidence of abuse. However, false accusations are a thing too. It's an imperfect system, but the courts are in the best position to judge what actually happened.
|
No, my views are not dangerous, I'm just being real and honest. I'm not taking any action on Lucic here at all aside from voicing my concerns about how this will play out. Spare me the virtue signaling/high horse treatment here. Do you still consider OJ innocent too, despite writing a book called "If I did it....."? Due process/fair trial under the law, etc is all vitally important, but there is no law that states that I need to give every human being the benefit of the doubt and trust they are innocent until a court of law has proven them guilty. If I see you steal something from my property, I should assume you're innocent until you've been proven guilty in court next year? Give me a break, man. I understand false accusations can be dangerous, but this situation does not seem to be fabricated.