[Fourteen FTW]

Originally Posted by Jay Random

You cannot say, ‘X is a universal rule, except for all the exceptions.’ If it were a universal rule, there would be no exceptions.



You don't know what ‘rule’ means in this context, do you?

If someone says ‘You CANNOT win the Cup without a top-2 pick that you drafted,’ then EVEN ONE EXCEPTION proves that statement wrong.



4th overall. The claim I am contending against is that it has to be a top-2 pick. Pietrangelo DOES NOT COUNT in supporting that claim.



LOL yourself. I'll talk about what I damned well want to talk about. When somebody claims that X is the ONLY way to win the Stanley Cup, they are obviously NOT talking exclusively about the Flames. At that point we are talking about the NHL in general, and if you don't like it, you can stick it.



Nobody has run the numbers to SHOW THE CORRELATION.



Bull. I am trying to point out that YOU PROVE NOTHING UNTIL YOU ESTABLISH A CORRELATION. And nobody has done the work with the null hypothesis!

You do know what a null hypothesis is, don't you?



‘LOL’ is not an argument. And the argument you are posting has NOT shown to be true, because YOU HAVE NOT ESTABLISHED THE CORRELATION.

I’ll give you a null hypothesis, spurs is a flip-flopper