Quote:
Originally Posted by RougeUnderoos
Fair enough. Do you actually consider this a legitimate threat to our society though? Blocking a few highways and railways is not to my life, let alone the entire society.
You said the government should send in the army to act with "swift, brutal force". An armed force that is ordered to act swiftly and brutally is probably going to be firing their guns.
|
Semantics, I guess. I consider tear gas, armored vehicles, butt ends of weapons used as clubs and physical force to be swift and brutal. Firing guns would be lethal force. I understand how that could be miscontrued.
It doesn't threaten your life, but it does threaten the life and livelihood of others and therein lies the problem and the imperative for action.