Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates
Iginla was a prospect who hadn't played an NHL game.
The clip was suggesting the Flames want play now guys in their mid 20s.
No one here is suggesting to not trade for elite young prospects.
If we trade our UFAs for a bunch of Yegors, we're stupid. There's no next Iginla's in that return.
|
He said the Flames want a top prospect and then brings up the Sharangovich trade as an example. In what world was Sharangovich a top prospect. Tanev for Garland would be the same as Sharangovich and they already rejected that and then mentions Hoglander who he thinks is expendable. Canucks slant on that entire clip.