Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Exactly, and yes it makes little sense, which is why I came to the conclusion I did - the only way it makes sense is if the goal is to tie up the defensemen, to leave the shooter free. And based on the Flames' desire to shoot vs pass at almost all times, that fits.
|
Agreed.
Even as a shake up play ... maybe 5% of the time you send both forwards without a puck as a disruption move.
But if it's every time it's pretty obvious to defend.