Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80
1. He and Lindholm have extensively-proven chemistry.
2. He creates offense signicantly better than Huberdeau does.
3. He's more exciting to watch.
4. The morale boost of him being back would be huge.
5. He's got 5 years left vs 7 more years for Huberdeau.
6. He's cheaper than Huberdeau.
|
All good points. But you acted like it was not even a debate. There are some points in opposition.
1. He’s created even less offence than Huberdeau this year.
2. I doubt he and Lindholm do much better without the third leg of Tkachuk or Monahan.
3. I think “morale boost” is pretty debatable. Huberdeau seems pretty popular in the room especially with younger guys. And with Weegar.
4. The term difference is true and I’ve mentioned it.
5. Cheaper is true and it’s why he won’t do it - he makes about the same in after tax dollars.