Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly
Hmm, not sure if subjective is the word I'd use. I think to an extent they can be quantifiable with analysis, albeit with a great deal of an error range. I think we'd agree that adding in additional factors to a model would generally decrease that number with respect to Calgary.
Also, starting position matters which in this case is known. I'd guess you'd have more opportunities to win if you start from a peak than from a downhill crest.
And, of course, random variation tops everything!
|
AKA, the butterfly effect