All this talk about bringing Sutter back like it would actually change a thing. It was beyond just players that couldn't stand being around him. I also wouldn't put it past this ownership to attempt it believing it to be another "if we can just squeak in" plays.
Hiring Huska was always the safe and cheap play and the results shouldn't be surprising.
These losses wouldn't be so bad if the future wasn't already mortgaged and the goal wasn't to avoid rebuilding at all costs.
I can't think of a more consistently poor use of assets with no reward in sight.
|