Quote:
Originally Posted by chemgear
The logo implies an environmental justification for their "preservation" of their enjoyed status quo. Oppose us and you're a planet raping killer!
|
Well I don't agree with this, for the record, but the angle here is that the city is selling "parkland" to RioCan. I don't know the story here, but I think when they did the tender they listed it as parkland, and that could date back to the 1983 deal that the city made? So there are people here with "save our parks" signage for that reason.
Obviously, I've made my stance clear, but the one thing I don't like is the "save our parks" and "what about the water table?!?!?" kind of angle. (I've heard that one as well...which strikes me as something they're familiar with given that they just dug down for the underpass for the BRT a few years ago).