Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver
In fairness, they usually are run by morons, though.
There's a reason for that. The pool of people interested in being in politics is incredibly small. It's a specific type that likes the "power" of politics, thinks they're the smartest guy in the room, enjoys public speaking, doesn't mind totally wacky hours and likes to glad hand. It's a wild combination of traits that not many people possess. As a result, it's common and expected you end up with a group of similar types of people that don't do a good job. All of those traits that steer somebody into politics have nothing to do with being skilled at running municipalities. Being qualified isn't one of the qualifications for being a politician.
First Lady is always my favourite example of that. She couldn't manage her own family or her own finances, but wanted to be a politician. What a fright, but a typical example.
|
I’ve always believed that municipal elections are more popularity contests than determinations of who is most qualified and best. I was an EO for a very long time and most people, when pressed, would say they could not do the job - for some of the reasons you mention. Don’t get me wrong: I love local government and there are many smart, well-intentioned people serving. Often then don’t deserve the criticism they have to endure. There are some goofs, too.