View Single Post
Old 10-25-2023, 02:42 PM   #73
Leondros
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
That's assuming the rules of supply and demand should apply to housing. But in a place like Canmore, supply is limited(mountains, rivers, flooding) so you need regulations to maintain a balance. Restrictions on percent of unoccupied housing would help, and having developments actually pay for the entirety of increased costs, so it isn't downloaded onto existing residents would be a good idea, too.


https://www.thecragandcanyon.ca/news...capital-budget

Does that sound like a well planned budgeting process? This has been happening for years. Is that fair to young families trying to stay in the valley?

It's kind of hilarious reading all these Calgarians trying to tell locals how they should manage their town. These aren't just my concerns, they are those of most long term residents.
Let's get real here, there is the space to build more in Canmore. The supply is being created by people against development.
Leondros is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Leondros For This Useful Post: