Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
Ugh...I'm not against signing Hanifin, depending on the numbers, but if you sign Hanifin then you have to kiss Lindhom good-bye.
We already have too many old players. Honestly...how many guys pushing 35+ do you want to have on the roster for the next ~decade or so?
|
What makes you think Hanifin is old? If the Flames do sign him for 8 years, he'll turn 35 midway through the last season of the deal. Age-wise, he's the least of the team's problems.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
‘You see in Calgary, [Ryan] Huska is no joke. It’s good. He’s really set on a specific model defensively. If you can be reliable, you have the freedom to play offence.’
—Ethan Wyttenbach
|