Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
In your original post, you immediately dismissed this as propaganda breeding hate, not because you had evidence of it being propaganda, but because you found the wrong link and assumed it was propaganda immediately. Perhaps in rushing to dismiss everything, you could take a longer pause and listen?
His clarification wasn’t even a particularly comforting one:
|
It's because of the way Q put it. He opened the post with a sentence about recent murder, and then goes on about what happened "some months ago". If you read Q's post again, he talks about both events and then says "what was Smotrich's reaction"? This assumed his reaction to both events, presumably expressed after the latest of them was done.
It was not the case though. Q made it look like Smotrich's comments were after killing of 13 years old, while in reality they were after first incident and have nothing to do with killing of 13-years old kid. It was clearly a manipulative post by Q, rather than me finding the wrong link.
So I initially read what Smotrich said about recent events in town. Then I looked at the date of Al Jazeera article and realized that Q is referring to Smotrich's comments that happen last winter. So I had to redo my entire post, although the point of propaganda still stands. The narrative about the events is drastically different in those articles.