Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
They are genuine arguments and are considered legal evidence in Canadian courts for establishing where Indigenous peoples have historical and traditional territories. Oral history is also considered legal evidence. I don't see why the same shouldn't apply in other parts of the world in some situation.
|
My ororiginal point was that living in Canada, and using archeological evidence to support Israeli rights to sovereignty over land but not holding the same standard for Indigenous peoples in Canada is hypocritical.